Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Artie L. Terrell
court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the search conducted by the police was violative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10851 - 2017-09-20
court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the search conducted by the police was violative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10851 - 2017-09-20
State v. Richard L. Borowitz
the search warrant application established probable cause to authorize a search of Borowitz’s residence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3686 - 2005-03-31
the search warrant application established probable cause to authorize a search of Borowitz’s residence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm; the search of Concepcion’s home was a private-party search rather than a government search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210301 - 2018-03-28
affirm; the search of Concepcion’s home was a private-party search rather than a government search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210301 - 2018-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Quaheem Moore’s motion to suppress physical evidence obtained during a search of Moore’s person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548789 - 2022-07-28
Quaheem Moore’s motion to suppress physical evidence obtained during a search of Moore’s person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548789 - 2022-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In Brown County Circuit Court case No. 2011CF705, the State charged Machicote with attempted armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104804 - 2017-09-21
. In Brown County Circuit Court case No. 2011CF705, the State charged Machicote with attempted armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104804 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence obtained in this warrantless search because his consent was not voluntary. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391352 - 2021-07-15
the evidence obtained in this warrantless search because his consent was not voluntary. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391352 - 2021-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124830 - 2017-09-21
, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124830 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124830 - 2014-10-27
by the circuit court, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124830 - 2014-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66409 - 2014-09-15
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66409 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66409 - 2011-06-22
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66409 - 2011-06-22