Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 5461 - 5470 of 58507 for speedy trial.
CA Blank Order
the front door. The charge set forth in the complaint related only to the robbery of Yegger. Prior to trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106932 - 2014-01-14
the front door. The charge set forth in the complaint related only to the robbery of Yegger. Prior to trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106932 - 2014-01-14
Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
from the trial court’s order, following a bench trial, denying him equal physical placement of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
from the trial court’s order, following a bench trial, denying him equal physical placement of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
and Schudson, J.J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jon T. appeals from the trial court’s order, following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16245 - 2017-09-21
and Schudson, J.J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jon T. appeals from the trial court’s order, following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16245 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Fernando R. Matos
that there was no reversible trial error and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 On the first day of trial, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4112 - 2017-09-20
that there was no reversible trial error and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 On the first day of trial, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4112 - 2017-09-20
Norman Hans Rechsteiner v. Karen Hildegarde Rechsteiner
are not supported by the facts or any rational basis. We conclude the record supports the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10532 - 2005-03-31
are not supported by the facts or any rational basis. We conclude the record supports the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) appeal from a judgment of the trial court awarding double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380509 - 2021-06-23
) appeal from a judgment of the trial court awarding double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380509 - 2021-06-23
State v. Curtis L. Levy, Jr.
. Levy has not alleged facts which, if true, establish that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17649 - 2005-04-11
. Levy has not alleged facts which, if true, establish that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17649 - 2005-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, Martin filed a Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial and postconviction lawyer gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82109 - 2012-05-07
, Martin filed a Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial and postconviction lawyer gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82109 - 2012-05-07
State v. James Chinavare
him of seven counts of intentionally disobeying a court order, following a court trial. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2753 - 2005-03-31
him of seven counts of intentionally disobeying a court order, following a court trial. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2753 - 2005-03-31
State v. James G. Langenbach
SNYDER, J. The State filed an interlocutory appeal of a trial court order refusing to allow it to call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3781 - 2005-03-31
SNYDER, J. The State filed an interlocutory appeal of a trial court order refusing to allow it to call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3781 - 2005-03-31