Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54621 - 54630 of 68291 for law.
Search results 54621 - 54630 of 68291 for law.
State v. Jeffrey H. Andrus
are undisputed, whether the State violated the plea agreement is a question of law we review without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31
are undisputed, whether the State violated the plea agreement is a question of law we review without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, that no finder of fact could believe the testimony. See State v. Oswald, 2000 WI App 3, ¶47, 232
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31013 - 2007-11-28
of law, that no finder of fact could believe the testimony. See State v. Oswald, 2000 WI App 3, ¶47, 232
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31013 - 2007-11-28
State v. Timothy R. Ragner
instead adjourn the case for six months and, if Denzer didn’t commit any further violations of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15860 - 2005-03-31
instead adjourn the case for six months and, if Denzer didn’t commit any further violations of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15860 - 2005-03-31
State v. David P. Byrne
and sentenced is not a sex offense under the section of the law requiring sex offender registration. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5344 - 2005-03-31
and sentenced is not a sex offense under the section of the law requiring sex offender registration. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5344 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry L. Cleveland
as required by § 973.12(1) presents a question of law which we decide independently of the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2005-03-31
as required by § 973.12(1) presents a question of law which we decide independently of the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118292 - 2014-07-29
a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118292 - 2014-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing is a question of law that we review independently. Id. If a defendant’s motion does not allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34474 - 2008-11-03
a hearing is a question of law that we review independently. Id. If a defendant’s motion does not allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34474 - 2008-11-03
CA Blank Order
Law, LLC 1971 Washington St., Ste. 201 Grafton, WI 53024 You are hereby notified that the Court has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97998 - 2013-06-11
Law, LLC 1971 Washington St., Ste. 201 Grafton, WI 53024 You are hereby notified that the Court has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97998 - 2013-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, WI 53140 Chris M. Bailey Bailey Law Office, L.L.C. 4810 S. 76th St., Ste. 202 Greenfield, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191028 - 2017-09-21
, WI 53140 Chris M. Bailey Bailey Law Office, L.L.C. 4810 S. 76th St., Ste. 202 Greenfield, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191028 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, existing case law prohibits the circuit court from relying upon scientific research on brain development
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580440 - 2022-10-25
, existing case law prohibits the circuit court from relying upon scientific research on brain development
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580440 - 2022-10-25