Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54651 - 54660 of 61820 for judgment.
Search results 54651 - 54660 of 61820 for judgment.
CA Blank Order
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143492 - 2015-06-29
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143492 - 2015-06-29
Frank C. Kesselring v. Ellen K. Kesselring
that the divorce was not yet final and therefore the $50,000 income imputation was not a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5891 - 2005-03-31
that the divorce was not yet final and therefore the $50,000 income imputation was not a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
February 9, 2023 judgment of conviction should be vacated. As the appellant, Ebensperger bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
February 9, 2023 judgment of conviction should be vacated. As the appellant, Ebensperger bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment for that of the trier of fact unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45245 - 2010-01-04
judgment for that of the trier of fact unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45245 - 2010-01-04
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a pro se motion to amend the original judgment of conviction. He noted that the sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104442 - 2013-11-18
filed a pro se motion to amend the original judgment of conviction. He noted that the sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104442 - 2013-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
there was no arguable basis for appeal and summarily affirmed the judgment. ¶5 In 2002, Gressel filed a Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
there was no arguable basis for appeal and summarily affirmed the judgment. ¶5 In 2002, Gressel filed a Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
extending my probation or enter a judgment against me. Smith initialed the section indicating that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57415 - 2014-09-15
extending my probation or enter a judgment against me. Smith initialed the section indicating that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57415 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
or No. 2009AP972 4 unreasonable, representing its will rather than its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45178 - 2014-09-15
or No. 2009AP972 4 unreasonable, representing its will rather than its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45178 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Homelsey on appeal, and counsel pursued a direct appeal on Homelsey’s behalf. We affirmed the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135072 - 2017-09-21
Homelsey on appeal, and counsel pursued a direct appeal on Homelsey’s behalf. We affirmed the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135072 - 2017-09-21
Langlade County Department of Human Services v. Ashleigh P.
findings James disputes. Under these circumstances, we are reluctant to substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6006 - 2005-03-31
findings James disputes. Under these circumstances, we are reluctant to substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6006 - 2005-03-31