Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54671 - 54680 of 83461 for simple case search.
Search results 54671 - 54680 of 83461 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
“there was another co-defendant with me on the case, that there was more than one person on the case being charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71556 - 2011-10-03
“there was another co-defendant with me on the case, that there was more than one person on the case being charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71556 - 2011-10-03
State v. Roland A. Smart
2002 WI App 240 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0569-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 240 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0569-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31
Northwest Properties v. Outagamie County
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3653
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13397 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3653
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13397 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138452 - 2015-03-31
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138452 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
North Henry is the pivotal case in this appeal, we will set forth the facts and discuss the holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35314 - 2014-09-15
North Henry is the pivotal case in this appeal, we will set forth the facts and discuss the holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35314 - 2014-09-15
State v. Pamela P.
the termination-of-parental-rights case against her.[1] Her only contention on appeal is that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2005-03-31
the termination-of-parental-rights case against her.[1] Her only contention on appeal is that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2005-03-31
Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc. v. Regnier Consulting Group, Inc.
2004 WI App 134 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1917 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6689 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 134 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1917 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6689 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arturo Melendez
a reasonable figure in this case, however, is somewhere in the area forty-five to fifty years, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
a reasonable figure in this case, however, is somewhere in the area forty-five to fifty years, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard P.T.
to this case arises from the mother’s receipt of AFDC benefits, as an AFDC recipient’s right to child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15426 - 2005-03-31
to this case arises from the mother’s receipt of AFDC benefits, as an AFDC recipient’s right to child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15426 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
535, ¶41. In this case, the trial court applied the standard sentencing factors and explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132312 - 2014-12-25
535, ¶41. In this case, the trial court applied the standard sentencing factors and explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132312 - 2014-12-25