Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 67573 for ct.

City of Madison v. Wade A. Cattell
(Ct. App. 1991); see also State v. Gaulrapp, 207 Wis. 2d 600, 605, 558 N.W.2d 696 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16236 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Maurice A. Jones
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-1211-CR Cir. Ct. No. 98-CM-1536 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5229 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas J. Enders v. Northwoods Inn
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 03-1096-FT Cir. Ct. No. 01CV000023 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6411 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2007AP1092 Cir. Ct. No. 2004FA125 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31243 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kevin L. Guibord
. Guibord, Nos. 95-0991-CR, 95-1323-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 1995). On December 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10360 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2012AP2766 Cir. Ct. No. 2012CV378 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101092 - 2013-08-21

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Arpke
. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W.2d 13 (Ct. App. 1989). The basic rule of statutory construction is to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2579 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2009AP2081 Cir. Ct. No. 2006ME45 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46612 - 2010-02-01

[PDF] State v. Kelsey C.R.
of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16246 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
), and that they had a factual basis, State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d 985, 989, 512 N.W.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106031 - 2013-12-26