Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68502 for did.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
for filing a response. When the State did not respond, the court examined the motion and denied it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
for filing a response. When the State did not respond, the court examined the motion and denied it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75108 - 2014-09-15
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75108 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David V. Pugh, Sr.
a vehicle approaching the intersection on Highway 131. The vehicle did not come to a complete stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7538 - 2017-09-19
a vehicle approaching the intersection on Highway 131. The vehicle did not come to a complete stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7538 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in a black truck, and she observed him having a drink and two shots with friends. The bar manager did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18
in a black truck, and she observed him having a drink and two shots with friends. The bar manager did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18
07AP2039 State v. John E. Gobis.doc
. At the hearing, the State did not offer any evidence; however, Gobis testified on his own behalf.[2] Gobis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2008-03-04
. At the hearing, the State did not offer any evidence; however, Gobis testified on his own behalf.[2] Gobis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2008-03-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
was unavailable at the time. The jury also asked, “Did the defendant say to the police officer ‘I drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60569 - 2014-09-15
was unavailable at the time. The jury also asked, “Did the defendant say to the police officer ‘I drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60569 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the second charge to the prospective jurors as follows: “Mr. John Paul did operate a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
the second charge to the prospective jurors as follows: “Mr. John Paul did operate a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
the police officer’s actions did not violate the Fourth Amendment, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59738 - 2011-02-07
the police officer’s actions did not violate the Fourth Amendment, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59738 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
pleas or be resentenced because: (1) the State did not follow the procedure set out in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3811 - 2017-09-20
pleas or be resentenced because: (1) the State did not follow the procedure set out in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3811 - 2017-09-20