Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68275 for did.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68275 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not offset the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not offset the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
because his counsel did not adequately argue for exclusion of his eleven prior convictions, which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28353 - 2014-09-15
because his counsel did not adequately argue for exclusion of his eleven prior convictions, which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven C. Wizner
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. Wizner argues that the trial court did not advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12183 - 2017-09-21
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. Wizner argues that the trial court did not advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8210 - 2017-09-19
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8210 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he did not possess the firearm as charged because the firearm belonged to Cullen, not Pitts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162147 - 2017-09-21
that he did not possess the firearm as charged because the firearm belonged to Cullen, not Pitts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162147 - 2017-09-21
State v. Waylon R. Zrinsky
contends that the PBT results should have been suppressed because the officer did not testify that he used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21270 - 2006-02-07
contends that the PBT results should have been suppressed because the officer did not testify that he used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21270 - 2006-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2014AP1235-CR 3 sentencing” and (2) it failed to explain why it did not follow the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133580 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP1235-CR 3 sentencing” and (2) it failed to explain why it did not follow the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Winnebago County DH&HS v. Lisa L.
of the dispositional hearing satisfies us that the court did not act as if the jury had recommended, advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24837 - 2017-09-21
of the dispositional hearing satisfies us that the court did not act as if the jury had recommended, advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24837 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, not for evidence that supports findings the circuit court did not make. Id. In reviewing the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45138 - 2014-09-15
, not for evidence that supports findings the circuit court did not make. Id. In reviewing the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45138 - 2014-09-15
07AP2039 State v. John E. Gobis.doc
. At the hearing, the State did not offer any evidence; however, Gobis testified on his own behalf.[2] Gobis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2008-03-04
. At the hearing, the State did not offer any evidence; however, Gobis testified on his own behalf.[2] Gobis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31980 - 2008-03-04