Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68499 for did.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68499 for did.
State v. Randy J. Smith
-adjudication motions and affidavits seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
-adjudication motions and affidavits seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a psychologist’s report. We hold that the court did not misinterpret the report, and affirm the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71621 - 2011-10-04
of a psychologist’s report. We hold that the court did not misinterpret the report, and affirm the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71621 - 2011-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not offset the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not offset the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
), 948.025, or 948.085 (2) did not involve sexual intercourse, as defined in s. 948.01 (6), either by the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31962 - 2008-02-27
), 948.025, or 948.085 (2) did not involve sexual intercourse, as defined in s. 948.01 (6), either by the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31962 - 2008-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
for filing a response. When the State did not respond, the court examined the motion and denied it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
for filing a response. When the State did not respond, the court examined the motion and denied it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75108 - 2014-09-15
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75108 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David V. Pugh, Sr.
a vehicle approaching the intersection on Highway 131. The vehicle did not come to a complete stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7538 - 2017-09-19
a vehicle approaching the intersection on Highway 131. The vehicle did not come to a complete stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7538 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Display Promotions, Inc. v. DoveBid Valuation Services, Inc.
. We agree with the circuit court that Display did not fall within the ambit of the foreseeable harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19397 - 2017-09-21
. We agree with the circuit court that Display did not fall within the ambit of the foreseeable harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19397 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in a black truck, and she observed him having a drink and two shots with friends. The bar manager did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18
in a black truck, and she observed him having a drink and two shots with friends. The bar manager did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18