Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 56200 for n y c.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 56200 for n y c.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3569 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3569 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, 548 N.W.2d 817 (1996). Prokop’s testimony at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
, 548 N.W.2d 817 (1996). Prokop’s testimony at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Joseph W.D., Sr.
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3568 - 2017-09-19
[] the relevant facts, appl[y] a proper standard of law, and reach[] a reasonable conclusion using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3568 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up,” was not the answer counsel wanted, but judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21
at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up,” was not the answer counsel wanted, but judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “the right to be present is an essential element of due process” and must “appl[y] equally to criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113166 - 2017-09-21
, “the right to be present is an essential element of due process” and must “appl[y] equally to criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113166 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with the victim’s rights requirements, the State advised that the victim, Jennifer Y., did not respond to the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
with the victim’s rights requirements, the State advised that the victim, Jennifer Y., did not respond to the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
State v. Joseph J. Hammill
occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92? A. No. Q. Is that a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27
occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92? A. No. Q. Is that a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in his or [another’s] defense” and that “[b]y not properly instructing the jury, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112660 - 2017-09-21
in his or [another’s] defense” and that “[b]y not properly instructing the jury, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112660 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court stated: “[Y]ou are required to provide a DNA sample if you have not previously provided one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58298 - 2010-12-27
, the trial court stated: “[Y]ou are required to provide a DNA sample if you have not previously provided one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58298 - 2010-12-27
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. Hammill
, the following exchange occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21
, the following exchange occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21