Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 74509 for public records.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 74509 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Singleton
are deemed abandoned). NO. 96-0626-CR 3 court correct the record. In support of its argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
are deemed abandoned). NO. 96-0626-CR 3 court correct the record. In support of its argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael D. Singleton
that the trial court correct the record. In support of its argument, the State submitted affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court correct the record. In support of its argument, the State submitted affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason R. Dixon
, 2001, and the conditions of his bond. That same day, according to the jail telephone records, Dixon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5328 - 2005-03-31
, 2001, and the conditions of his bond. That same day, according to the jail telephone records, Dixon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5328 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason R. Dixon
, 2001, and the conditions of his bond. That same day, according to the jail telephone records, Dixon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5327 - 2005-03-31
, 2001, and the conditions of his bond. That same day, according to the jail telephone records, Dixon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, there were briefs filed by Leon W. Todd, assistant state public defender. There was an oral argument
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265731 - 2020-06-25
, there were briefs filed by Leon W. Todd, assistant state public defender. There was an oral argument
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265731 - 2020-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for lack of personal jurisdiction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214614 - 2018-06-20
for lack of personal jurisdiction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214614 - 2018-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Nevada Jerome
that the record provides insufficient facts to support the sentences. We disagree with both contentions. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5900 - 2017-09-19
that the record provides insufficient facts to support the sentences. We disagree with both contentions. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5900 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the public.[3] The court noted that Harris had a “lengthy record” dating back to the 1990s and was out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86900 - 2012-09-11
the public.[3] The court noted that Harris had a “lengthy record” dating back to the 1990s and was out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86900 - 2012-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
character and lengthy criminal record, the seriousness of the offense, and the need to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86900 - 2014-09-15
character and lengthy criminal record, the seriousness of the offense, and the need to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86900 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or excessive sentence. No. 2019AP189-CR 2 Upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251811 - 2019-12-23
or excessive sentence. No. 2019AP189-CR 2 Upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251811 - 2019-12-23