Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5481 - 5490 of 18506 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Harga Satuan Bongkar Keramik 40 x 40 Murah Girimulyo Kulon Progo.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and voluntary despite the identified inadequacy of the plea colloquy.” See id., ¶40. The State does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730769 - 2023-11-22

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
briefed.”); Clean Wis., Inc. v. PSC, 2005 WI 93, ¶180 n.40, 282 Wis. 2d 250, 700 N.W.2d 768 (“We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1009666 - 2025-09-17

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
, or reasonably decide that a particular investigation is unnecessary. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶40, 264 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28357 - 2007-03-07

[PDF] State v. George W. Allen
that "the evidentiary value of the narcotics dog's alert [is] minimal." United States v. $5,000 in U.S. Currency, 40 F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8724 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Robert A. Zimmerlee
AddtlCap Panel2 2017-09-21T16:46:40-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24943 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert A. Schweiner
, and deterrence of others. Id., ¶40. It must identify the general objectives of greatest importance, which may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7515 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and protection of the public the most important. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶40-43 & nn.10, 11, 270
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160642 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Helgeland v. Wisconsin Muns., 2008 WI 9, ¶¶40-41, 307 Wis. 2d 1, 745 N.W.2d 1 (footnote omitted). Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977445 - 2025-07-01

COURT OF APPEALS
. (citation omitted). This is a “common sense” test, id. at 139-40, and police officers are not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86101 - 2012-08-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s representation fell below objective standards of reasonableness. State v. Carter, 2010 WI 40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241564 - 2019-06-04