Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5481 - 5490 of 68499 for did.
Search results 5481 - 5490 of 68499 for did.
State v. Randy J. Smith
-adjudication motions and affidavits seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
-adjudication motions and affidavits seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
Roger Walker v. Dennis Schrimpf
did he owe the Walkers a duty of care. The Walkers argue that Schrimpf created the indentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
did he owe the Walkers a duty of care. The Walkers argue that Schrimpf created the indentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a psychologist’s report. We hold that the court did not misinterpret the report, and affirm the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71621 - 2011-10-04
of a psychologist’s report. We hold that the court did not misinterpret the report, and affirm the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71621 - 2011-10-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
was unavailable at the time. The jury also asked, “Did the defendant say to the police officer ‘I drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60569 - 2014-09-15
was unavailable at the time. The jury also asked, “Did the defendant say to the police officer ‘I drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60569 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not offset the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not offset the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
, not for evidence that supports findings the circuit court did not make. Id. In reviewing the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45138 - 2014-09-15
, not for evidence that supports findings the circuit court did not make. Id. In reviewing the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45138 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
), 948.025, or 948.085 (2) did not involve sexual intercourse, as defined in s. 948.01 (6), either by the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31962 - 2008-02-27
), 948.025, or 948.085 (2) did not involve sexual intercourse, as defined in s. 948.01 (6), either by the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31962 - 2008-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
for filing a response. When the State did not respond, the court examined the motion and denied it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
for filing a response. When the State did not respond, the court examined the motion and denied it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75108 - 2014-09-15
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75108 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19