Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5481 - 5490 of 72987 for we.
Search results 5481 - 5490 of 72987 for we.
Susan H. Ripple v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.
complaint and granting R.F. Technologies, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4419 - 2005-03-31
complaint and granting R.F. Technologies, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4419 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harry Montey
his post-judgment motion claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We reject Montey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13694 - 2005-03-31
his post-judgment motion claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We reject Montey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13694 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L.
restitution; therefore, its order of restitution violated the statutory mandates. We disagree; instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13015 - 2017-09-21
restitution; therefore, its order of restitution violated the statutory mandates. We disagree; instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13015 - 2017-09-21
Mary J. Pietrowski v. Richard G. Dufrane
in the character of the neighborhood and constitute an abandonment of the restrictive covenant. We are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2898 - 2005-03-31
in the character of the neighborhood and constitute an abandonment of the restrictive covenant. We are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2898 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tina S. Cordero
.[3] We agree and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2618 - 2005-03-31
.[3] We agree and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2618 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason J.C.
§ 938.355(4m) to expunge the 1994 delinquency adjudications. The trial court agreed. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31
§ 938.355(4m) to expunge the 1994 delinquency adjudications. The trial court agreed. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Linda L. Middaugh
)(a). Middaugh raises numerous challenges to her conviction on appeal, all of which we reject. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7428 - 2017-09-20
)(a). Middaugh raises numerous challenges to her conviction on appeal, all of which we reject. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7428 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion to review his presentence investigation (PSI) report. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239679 - 2019-04-30
denying his postconviction motion to review his presentence investigation (PSI) report. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239679 - 2019-04-30
[PDF]
Susan H. Ripple v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.
. Technologies, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. We conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4419 - 2017-09-19
. Technologies, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. We conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4419 - 2017-09-19
County of Dodge v. Michael J.K.
hearing. We conclude that the County correctly reads the statute and we therefore reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2009-01-20
hearing. We conclude that the County correctly reads the statute and we therefore reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11222 - 2009-01-20