Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54851 - 54860 of 59470 for quit claim deed.
Search results 54851 - 54860 of 59470 for quit claim deed.
State v. Eugene F. Line
-sentencing. He claims the trial court erred by failing to state on the record that it considered appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
-sentencing. He claims the trial court erred by failing to state on the record that it considered appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
State v. John D. Meindl
to exclude the results of his Intoximeter test, claiming that Wis. Stat. § 885.235 directs that test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
to exclude the results of his Intoximeter test, claiming that Wis. Stat. § 885.235 directs that test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
WI APP 132
: “To allow a defendant to claim the benefit of an agreement where he, himself, is in default, offends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103245 - 2017-09-21
: “To allow a defendant to claim the benefit of an agreement where he, himself, is in default, offends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103245 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, dated 2001, wherein the son claimed to have assaulted A.K. The circuit court rejected any argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66208 - 2014-09-15
, dated 2001, wherein the son claimed to have assaulted A.K. The circuit court rejected any argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66208 - 2014-09-15
Carol Van Cleve v. Jeffrey Nehring
] Nehring claims that the trial court erred by refusing pattern jury instruction Wis J I—Civil 1277.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9805 - 2005-03-31
] Nehring claims that the trial court erred by refusing pattern jury instruction Wis J I—Civil 1277.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9805 - 2005-03-31
State v. Freddie L. Carter
to make an adequate record of Carter’s request for replacement counsel. The first claim fails because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4424 - 2005-03-31
to make an adequate record of Carter’s request for replacement counsel. The first claim fails because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4424 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher McSwain
that the testimony supports inferences consistent with his innocence, claiming that he was set up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9728 - 2017-09-19
that the testimony supports inferences consistent with his innocence, claiming that he was set up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9728 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stuart D. Yates
to the argument presented above, he claimed: (1) he was not made aware that a consequence of his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15674 - 2005-03-31
to the argument presented above, he claimed: (1) he was not made aware that a consequence of his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a double jeopardy claim and is defined as charging “a single criminal offense in more than one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255386 - 2020-02-25
is a double jeopardy claim and is defined as charging “a single criminal offense in more than one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255386 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
County of Adams v. Daniel M. Ciesla
of prior hearings—was apparently undertaken so that Ciesla could preserve for appeal his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15461 - 2017-09-21
of prior hearings—was apparently undertaken so that Ciesla could preserve for appeal his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15461 - 2017-09-21