Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54861 - 54870 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 54861 - 54870 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to overcome that presumption here. The record shows that his trial counsel, Stephen Sawyer, did object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211793 - 2018-04-26
to overcome that presumption here. The record shows that his trial counsel, Stephen Sawyer, did object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211793 - 2018-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
medication. The record does not support this determination. Dr. Drexler testified that Hardy accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650821 - 2023-05-02
medication. The record does not support this determination. Dr. Drexler testified that Hardy accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650821 - 2023-05-02
State v. Kyle W.F.
at the fact-finding hearing to be acknowledging that was an error. [3] There is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
at the fact-finding hearing to be acknowledging that was an error. [3] There is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bruce Nelson appeals[1] his divorce judgment, arguing the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88801 - 2012-10-29
and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bruce Nelson appeals[1] his divorce judgment, arguing the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88801 - 2012-10-29
CA Blank Order
account titled in La Roche’s name. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123951 - 2014-10-09
account titled in La Roche’s name. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123951 - 2014-10-09
State v. Wang Meng Yang
will affirm the trial court's decision if the record shows that the court considered the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7996 - 2005-03-31
will affirm the trial court's decision if the record shows that the court considered the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7996 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
review of Garrity and Oddsen, both of which are distinguishable from the facts of record here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
review of Garrity and Oddsen, both of which are distinguishable from the facts of record here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
State v. Allan N.
finding Kimeo," this court has located nothing in the record to support that.[5] In any event, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
finding Kimeo," this court has located nothing in the record to support that.[5] In any event, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David K. Kalan v. City of St. Francis
irrelevant to the issues raised by the cases. What is clear from the documents in the record is that Kalan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8726 - 2017-09-19
irrelevant to the issues raised by the cases. What is clear from the documents in the record is that Kalan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8726 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of travel. The trooper activated his squad video recording system and followed the truck. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49213 - 2010-07-08
of travel. The trooper activated his squad video recording system and followed the truck. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49213 - 2010-07-08