Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5491 - 5500 of 35996 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 5491 - 5500 of 35996 for affidavit of mailing.
State v. Eric C. Abrams
to modify his sentence. The trial court denied his motion. Abrams’s first claim is that the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10633 - 2005-03-31
to modify his sentence. The trial court denied his motion. Abrams’s first claim is that the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10633 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric C. Abrams
to modify his sentence. The trial court denied his motion. Abrams’s first claim is that the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10632 - 2005-03-31
to modify his sentence. The trial court denied his motion. Abrams’s first claim is that the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10632 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy S. Simplot
residence for drugs. Anderson provided an affidavit in support of his application averring, among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3303 - 2017-09-19
residence for drugs. Anderson provided an affidavit in support of his application averring, among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3303 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction should reflect that. ¶4 Crouthers provided two affidavits in support of his motion. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73388 - 2011-11-07
of conviction should reflect that. ¶4 Crouthers provided two affidavits in support of his motion. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73388 - 2011-11-07
State v. Randy S. Simplot
to search Simplot’s residence for drugs. Anderson provided an affidavit in support of his application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3303 - 2005-03-31
to search Simplot’s residence for drugs. Anderson provided an affidavit in support of his application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3303 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, supporting its motion with an affidavit from one of its directors, referencing attached documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181984 - 2017-09-21
, supporting its motion with an affidavit from one of its directors, referencing attached documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In support, Routt’s attorney swore out an affidavit, claiming she had spoken with the sentencing judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630159 - 2023-03-14
. In support, Routt’s attorney swore out an affidavit, claiming she had spoken with the sentencing judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630159 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or more of the defendants and an affidavit that the defendant is in default for failure to join issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70087 - 2014-09-15
or more of the defendants and an affidavit that the defendant is in default for failure to join issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70087 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dawn M. Herfel
County OWI conviction. In support of her motion, Herfel submitted her own affidavit claiming that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19466 - 2005-08-31
County OWI conviction. In support of her motion, Herfel submitted her own affidavit claiming that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19466 - 2005-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s factual findings. Thus, for example, Aurora asks us to consider an affidavit filed with its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61618 - 2011-03-23
court’s factual findings. Thus, for example, Aurora asks us to consider an affidavit filed with its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61618 - 2011-03-23