Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5491 - 5500 of 74952 for public records.
Search results 5491 - 5500 of 74952 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because under the facts alleged in the amended complaint, a private nuisance claim is barred on public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143087 - 2017-09-21
because under the facts alleged in the amended complaint, a private nuisance claim is barred on public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143087 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derek E.
him. Derek claims the court erred in finding that it would be in the best interest of both the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13282 - 2005-03-31
him. Derek claims the court erred in finding that it would be in the best interest of both the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13282 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
improperly allowed the state public defender to represent Karmen at the October 30, 2013 de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136565 - 2017-09-21
improperly allowed the state public defender to represent Karmen at the October 30, 2013 de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136565 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
payments.[2] He argues: (1) the court improperly allowed the state public defender to represent Karmen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136565 - 2015-03-04
payments.[2] He argues: (1) the court improperly allowed the state public defender to represent Karmen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136565 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
WI APP 87
2 “that the public welfare will be promoted by dissolution of the district.”1 The District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51289 - 2014-09-15
2 “that the public welfare will be promoted by dissolution of the district.”1 The District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51289 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 87
“that the public welfare will be promoted by dissolution of the district.”[1] The District argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51289 - 2010-07-27
“that the public welfare will be promoted by dissolution of the district.”[1] The District argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51289 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Doris G.
to present at trial (the records and testimony of Wagner, New and Mack) and that the public interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12159 - 2017-09-21
to present at trial (the records and testimony of Wagner, New and Mack) and that the public interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12159 - 2017-09-21
State v. Doris G.
and treatment services; for example, sealing from public scrutiny the record of any proceeding for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12159 - 2005-03-31
and treatment services; for example, sealing from public scrutiny the record of any proceeding for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12159 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gerald G. Geyso v. Richard Daly
to County Highway D or whether, as members of the public or as abutting landowners, the Dalys have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7384 - 2017-09-20
to County Highway D or whether, as members of the public or as abutting landowners, the Dalys have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7384 - 2017-09-20