Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54941 - 54950 of 83164 for simple case search.
Search results 54941 - 54950 of 83164 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was under the influence. We affirm. ¶2 The facts of this case are not in dispute. On May 31, 2015
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174394 - 2017-09-21
was under the influence. We affirm. ¶2 The facts of this case are not in dispute. On May 31, 2015
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174394 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
S. Green III (L.C. #2013CM406) Before Gundrum, J. In these consolidated cases, Charles S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146175 - 2017-09-21
S. Green III (L.C. #2013CM406) Before Gundrum, J. In these consolidated cases, Charles S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing in this case. No. 2021AP82 3 of evidence regarding the intervals between Roberts’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546983 - 2022-07-27
hearing in this case. No. 2021AP82 3 of evidence regarding the intervals between Roberts’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546983 - 2022-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Michael H. Woeshnick
. See id. In such a case, the complainant must establish: “(1) The underlying circumstances from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14862 - 2017-09-21
. See id. In such a case, the complainant must establish: “(1) The underlying circumstances from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14862 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
been included in the appellant’s appendix. In another case, we sanctioned counsel for certifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15
been included in the appellant’s appendix. In another case, we sanctioned counsel for certifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29106 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
mandatory release date. This is not a case where the defendant is a good risk for parole of any sort and so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34814 - 2008-12-08
mandatory release date. This is not a case where the defendant is a good risk for parole of any sort and so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34814 - 2008-12-08
Outagamie County v. Martin J. McGlone
). McGlone had not applied for an exemption permit. ¶4 The case proceeded to a bench trial on February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3982 - 2005-03-31
). McGlone had not applied for an exemption permit. ¶4 The case proceeded to a bench trial on February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Lohmeier
of these cases were decided under WIS. STAT. § 57.072 (1975), which was repealed and recreated by ch. 353, Laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2166 - 2017-09-19
of these cases were decided under WIS. STAT. § 57.072 (1975), which was repealed and recreated by ch. 353, Laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2166 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas C. Smith
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
testified in this case. However, the police chief added nothing of significance to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
testified in this case. However, the police chief added nothing of significance to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27