Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54971 - 54980 of 83167 for simple case search.
Search results 54971 - 54980 of 83167 for simple case search.
State v. Jonathon L. McIntosh
must determine what effect the error had upon the guilty verdict in the present case." Id. at 62-63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9229 - 2005-03-31
must determine what effect the error had upon the guilty verdict in the present case." Id. at 62-63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9229 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Spencer Hutchinson v. Robert Buckley
) dismissing this case and imposing sanctions. Because of Hutchinson’s insufficient discovery response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3652 - 2017-09-19
) dismissing this case and imposing sanctions. Because of Hutchinson’s insufficient discovery response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3652 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas B.
, but the court suppressed the statements taken on July 18, 1996, regarding the razor blades. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12458 - 2017-09-21
, but the court suppressed the statements taken on July 18, 1996, regarding the razor blades. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion when it imposed a near maximum sentence in this case.” The postconviction court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
discretion when it imposed a near maximum sentence in this case.” The postconviction court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of Field’s brief and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039471 - 2025-11-20
on our review of Field’s brief and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039471 - 2025-11-20
[PDF]
Jayson D. Edwards v. Gary R. McCaughtry
that will satisfy the constitutional minimum will vary from case to case depending on the severity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3797 - 2017-09-20
that will satisfy the constitutional minimum will vary from case to case depending on the severity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3797 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to discuss his case with his attorney, and there is nothing in the record to suggest that counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208873 - 2018-02-23
to discuss his case with his attorney, and there is nothing in the record to suggest that counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208873 - 2018-02-23
Richland School District v. Gerald Cummer
a declaratory judgment action for a ruling on the arbitrability of Cummer's grievance. (Case No. 91-CV-122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7885 - 2005-03-31
a declaratory judgment action for a ruling on the arbitrability of Cummer's grievance. (Case No. 91-CV-122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7885 - 2005-03-31
James B. Froelich v. Mary L. Stelzer
discretionary decision if the court applied the proper legal standards to the facts of the case in a reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17599 - 2005-04-12
discretionary decision if the court applied the proper legal standards to the facts of the case in a reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17599 - 2005-04-12
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31