Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54971 - 54980 of 83414 for simple case search.
Search results 54971 - 54980 of 83414 for simple case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
2007AP591 2 was unable to pay the civil forfeitures assessed in two traffic regulation cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30262 - 2014-09-15
2007AP591 2 was unable to pay the civil forfeitures assessed in two traffic regulation cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30262 - 2014-09-15
George S. Wood v. Garth T. Anacker
. Castle Co., 132 Wis. 2d 364, 369, 392 N.W.2d 119 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶3 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18801 - 2005-06-29
. Castle Co., 132 Wis. 2d 364, 369, 392 N.W.2d 119 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶3 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18801 - 2005-06-29
State v. Marc A. Lindskog
a published opinion, id. at 189-90, we will apply List to the facts of this case and affirm. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7491 - 2005-03-31
a published opinion, id. at 189-90, we will apply List to the facts of this case and affirm. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7491 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Balint
are reversed and these cases are remanded for a new trial. I. BACKGROUND Balint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9266 - 2005-03-31
are reversed and these cases are remanded for a new trial. I. BACKGROUND Balint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9266 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737080 - 2023-12-07
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737080 - 2023-12-07
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101869 - 2013-09-09
postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101869 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195749 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195749 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Human Services Center v. Francis D. Bocek
of requisite probable cause for temporary detention was proven by the plaintiff in this case.” The Center
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15253 - 2017-09-21
of requisite probable cause for temporary detention was proven by the plaintiff in this case.” The Center
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John C. Koshick v. State
. The order then stated that the defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and that the case is dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3241 - 2017-09-19
. The order then stated that the defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and that the case is dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3241 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
a “new factor” allowing resentencing, an analysis we have rejected before in other cases. Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55888 - 2014-09-15
a “new factor” allowing resentencing, an analysis we have rejected before in other cases. Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55888 - 2014-09-15