Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54981 - 54990 of 59453 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] State v. John W. Moore
is a quote from a September 8 transcript, and the State quotes from what it claims is the trial judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14546 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Fredrick E. Jones
been informed by the court of a report that claimed Jones planned to grab a deputy’s gun. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19803 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jonathan C. Lewis
and Caflisch responded with several counterclaims, including a claim that Strum had conspired to damage them
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16608 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Vito George Ambrosia
-Miranda statement, claiming that the second statement was tainted by the coercive nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10076 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Gary R. McCaughtry
other claims are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. ¶2 This case arises out of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4265 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that his trial counsel was ineffective. To succeed on his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, Price
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944343 - 2025-04-23

Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System v. City of Milwaukee
ERS trust funds used to pay performance-based fees, claiming that the City had violated various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14067 - 2005-03-31

Northeast Corporate Centre v. Board of Review of the City of Glendale
income information relating to its property and to other properties it claimed were comparable. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14584 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeremiah C.
to the contrary, the State relies upon Wis. Stat. § 938.355(4), which it claims applies to all orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
claimed that her “procedural due process right to be sentenced in a fair manner was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242461 - 2019-06-25