Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 551 - 560 of 6674 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 230 Cm Leuwidamar Lebak.
Search results 551 - 560 of 6674 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 230 Cm Leuwidamar Lebak.
COURT OF APPEALS
who [Arrington wa]s.” It began its remarks by expressing its familiarity with the case generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
who [Arrington wa]s.” It began its remarks by expressing its familiarity with the case generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
her probationary period,” or that “there [wa]s no showing that she won’t have the means to acquire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33621 - 2014-09-15
her probationary period,” or that “there [wa]s no showing that she won’t have the means to acquire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33621 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
,” or that “there [wa]s no showing that she won’t have the means to acquire employment when she is released on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33621 - 2008-08-04
,” or that “there [wa]s no showing that she won’t have the means to acquire employment when she is released on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33621 - 2008-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 06, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
term; trial counsel recognized that “[t]his [wa]s a prison case.” The trial court imposed a forty-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28315 - 2007-03-05
term; trial counsel recognized that “[t]his [wa]s a prison case.” The trial court imposed a forty-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28315 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
Washington’s character, commenting that this [wa]s the worst presentence investigation [the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26959 - 2014-09-15
Washington’s character, commenting that this [wa]s the worst presentence investigation [the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26959 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
be resentenced because at sentencing, “there [wa]s no discussion on the record that the entire basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
be resentenced because at sentencing, “there [wa]s no discussion on the record that the entire basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and this court’s independent review of the record, “there [wa]s no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27303 - 2014-09-15
, and this court’s independent review of the record, “there [wa]s no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27303 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
involved convictions for cocaine-related violations of WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1. or (1m)(cm)1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196863 - 2017-09-21
involved convictions for cocaine-related violations of WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)1. or (1m)(cm)1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196863 - 2017-09-21
State v. David A. Lehman
or s. 948.02, 948.025, 948.03, 948.05, 948.055, 948.06, 948.07, 948.075, 948.08, or 948.095. (cm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6474 - 2005-03-31
or s. 948.02, 948.025, 948.03, 948.05, 948.055, 948.06, 948.07, 948.075, 948.08, or 948.095. (cm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6474 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)4. and 939.05; Wis JI—Criminal 6035 and 400. To prove the defendant guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105608 - 2013-12-10
. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)4. and 939.05; Wis JI—Criminal 6035 and 400. To prove the defendant guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105608 - 2013-12-10