Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 551 - 560 of 24459 for extending.
Search results 551 - 560 of 24459 for extending.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Darrell M. Brown appeals from a reconfinement order entered after the revocation of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44278 - 2014-09-15
. Darrell M. Brown appeals from a reconfinement order entered after the revocation of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44278 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mario C.
ordered the original disposition to extend the date of the disposition by one year but labeled the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10436 - 2017-09-20
ordered the original disposition to extend the date of the disposition by one year but labeled the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10436 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Rodney K. Stenseth
, with a maximum period of confinement of five years followed by a maximum of five years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5974 - 2017-09-19
, with a maximum period of confinement of five years followed by a maximum of five years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5974 - 2017-09-19
2009 WI APP 148
years and six months of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision. On April 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40411 - 2009-10-27
years and six months of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision. On April 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40411 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in which he argued that the stop was unlawfully extended by Officer Roth to conduct field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971144 - 2025-06-17
in which he argued that the stop was unlawfully extended by Officer Roth to conduct field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971144 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a postconviction motion challenging a condition of Smith’s extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857154 - 2024-10-03
be arguable merit to a postconviction motion challenging a condition of Smith’s extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857154 - 2024-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a postconviction motion challenging a condition of Smith’s extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857154 - 2024-10-03
be arguable merit to a postconviction motion challenging a condition of Smith’s extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857154 - 2024-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
extended supervision by the same amount; (2) acted contrary to Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1) (2001-02)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32434 - 2005-08-31
extended supervision by the same amount; (2) acted contrary to Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1) (2001-02)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32434 - 2005-08-31
State v. Tony G. Longmire
Longmire also complains that the trial court sentenced him to an excessive period of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
Longmire also complains that the trial court sentenced him to an excessive period of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tony G. Longmire
sentenced him to an excessive period of extended supervision and failed to consider relevant “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19
sentenced him to an excessive period of extended supervision and failed to consider relevant “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19