Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 551 - 560 of 20302 for sai.
Search results 551 - 560 of 20302 for sai.
State v. Tamar T. Brown
declined. She could not say where Brown then put the drug bag because she was watching through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20587 - 2005-12-12
declined. She could not say where Brown then put the drug bag because she was watching through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20587 - 2005-12-12
Oscar J. Williams v. Patrick J. Fiedler
of heckling in the background from numerous college students, saying ‘are you going to let that nigger talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17670 - 2005-05-24
of heckling in the background from numerous college students, saying ‘are you going to let that nigger talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17670 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
State v. Leroy A. Yench
. Yench. He then stated he understood. I reread the part where it says, “Will you submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
. Yench. He then stated he understood. I reread the part where it says, “Will you submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
State v. Diane M. Somers
was not admitted into evidence at her hearing, the trial court lacked jurisdiction over her person. She also says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
was not admitted into evidence at her hearing, the trial court lacked jurisdiction over her person. She also says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kathleen A. Krogman
that he would “take a look at that, and I won’t dispute what the court’s saying.” Apparently counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14367 - 2005-03-31
that he would “take a look at that, and I won’t dispute what the court’s saying.” Apparently counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant possessed recently stolen property.” (Emphasis added.) The instruction did not say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82109 - 2014-09-15
that the defendant possessed recently stolen property.” (Emphasis added.) The instruction did not say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82109 - 2014-09-15
State v. Constantine F. Weimer
cannot be convicted for violating § 944.30(1) if all he says is that he will pay “$20.00 for sex” without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19094 - 2005-07-25
cannot be convicted for violating § 944.30(1) if all he says is that he will pay “$20.00 for sex” without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19094 - 2005-07-25
State v. Leroy A. Yench
then stated he understood. I reread the part where it says, “Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
then stated he understood. I reread the part where it says, “Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
knew Memphis, how long he’d known him, where the man lived. Why did the defendant say Memphis was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106741 - 2014-01-14
knew Memphis, how long he’d known him, where the man lived. Why did the defendant say Memphis was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106741 - 2014-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
.) The instruction did not say that “Martin possessed recently stolen property.” The trial court would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82109 - 2012-05-07
.) The instruction did not say that “Martin possessed recently stolen property.” The trial court would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82109 - 2012-05-07