Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 551 - 560 of 20363 for sai.
Search results 551 - 560 of 20363 for sai.
[PDF]
State v. Perry C. Love
. Is that what you’re saying? JUROR STRACK: Well, it’s either that way or I’m to presume Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14423 - 2014-09-15
. Is that what you’re saying? JUROR STRACK: Well, it’s either that way or I’m to presume Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14423 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, the statute says the court "shall" impose the surcharge. The court of appeals certified Mr. Michael L
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214321 - 2018-06-15
, the statute says the court "shall" impose the surcharge. The court of appeals certified Mr. Michael L
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214321 - 2018-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
knew Memphis, how long he’d known him, where the man lived. Why did the defendant say Memphis was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106741 - 2014-01-14
knew Memphis, how long he’d known him, where the man lived. Why did the defendant say Memphis was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106741 - 2014-01-14
[PDF]
State v. Constantine F. Weimer
). No. 2005AP771-CR 2 argues that a defendant cannot be convicted for violating § 944.30(1) if all he says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19094 - 2017-09-21
). No. 2005AP771-CR 2 argues that a defendant cannot be convicted for violating § 944.30(1) if all he says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19094 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kathleen A. Krogman
that he would “take a look at that, and I won’t dispute what the court’s saying.” Apparently counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14367 - 2005-03-31
that he would “take a look at that, and I won’t dispute what the court’s saying.” Apparently counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Diane M. Somers
into evidence at her hearing, the trial court lacked jurisdiction over her person. She also says that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
into evidence at her hearing, the trial court lacked jurisdiction over her person. She also says that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
State v. Leroy A. Yench
then stated he understood. I reread the part where it says, “Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
then stated he understood. I reread the part where it says, “Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31
State v. Diane M. Somers
was not admitted into evidence at her hearing, the trial court lacked jurisdiction over her person. She also says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
was not admitted into evidence at her hearing, the trial court lacked jurisdiction over her person. She also says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leroy A. Yench
. Yench. He then stated he understood. I reread the part where it says, “Will you submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
. Yench. He then stated he understood. I reread the part where it says, “Will you submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3668 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
.) The instruction did not say that “Martin possessed recently stolen property.” The trial court would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82109 - 2012-05-07
.) The instruction did not say that “Martin possessed recently stolen property.” The trial court would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82109 - 2012-05-07