Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 12260 for 2012.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 12260 for 2012.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
v. Balke, No. 2011AP1961-FT, unpublished op. and order (WI App Dec. 14, 2011). On July 25, 2012
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97884 - 2014-09-15
v. Balke, No. 2011AP1961-FT, unpublished op. and order (WI App Dec. 14, 2011). On July 25, 2012
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97884 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 20, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89394 - 2012-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 20, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89394 - 2012-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849464 - 2024-09-17
novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849464 - 2024-09-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 1399, 1409 (2012) (explaining that a defendant must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92807 - 2014-09-15
Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 1399, 1409 (2012) (explaining that a defendant must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92807 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was statutorily eligible for the ERP. At sentencing on April 13, 2012, the trial court imposed a six-year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104491 - 2017-09-21
was statutorily eligible for the ERP. At sentencing on April 13, 2012, the trial court imposed a six-year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104491 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for appeal. We therefore affirm the orders. On October 3, 2012, the State of Wisconsin filed petitions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107338 - 2014-01-28
for appeal. We therefore affirm the orders. On October 3, 2012, the State of Wisconsin filed petitions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107338 - 2014-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83766 - 2012-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83766 - 2012-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87807 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87807 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
, 2012, and continued for several dates, concluding on March 19, 2013. At the hearings, the court heard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
, 2012, and continued for several dates, concluding on March 19, 2013. At the hearings, the court heard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849464 - 2024-09-17
novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849464 - 2024-09-17