Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 65130 for or b.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 65130 for or b.
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
. § 9.01(b)(6) (1999-2000)[1] applies only to parties who are “aggrieved” by the recount. Muller opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31
. § 9.01(b)(6) (1999-2000)[1] applies only to parties who are “aggrieved” by the recount. Muller opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to medications” with Janice “[b]ecause I don’t believe there are any alternatives to treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974004 - 2025-06-25
to medications” with Janice “[b]ecause I don’t believe there are any alternatives to treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974004 - 2025-06-25
City of Milwaukee v. Ruby Washington
easily done so in § 252.07(9)(a)3 as it has elsewhere. See Wis. Stat. § 51.20(9)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24633 - 2007-04-09
easily done so in § 252.07(9)(a)3 as it has elsewhere. See Wis. Stat. § 51.20(9)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24633 - 2007-04-09
Julie L. Rabideau v. City of Racine
COUNTY: Racine JUDGE: Allan B. Torhorst JUSTICES: Concurred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17581 - 2009-02-19
COUNTY: Racine JUDGE: Allan B. Torhorst JUSTICES: Concurred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17581 - 2009-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in support of her motion. See WIS. STAT. § 802.06(2)(b) (“If on a motion asserting the defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464160 - 2021-12-22
in support of her motion. See WIS. STAT. § 802.06(2)(b) (“If on a motion asserting the defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464160 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
note that May 5, 2024, was a Sunday. See generally WIS. STAT. § 902.01(2)(b) (stating that a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
note that May 5, 2024, was a Sunday. See generally WIS. STAT. § 902.01(2)(b) (stating that a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
Crystal Lake Cheese Factory v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
accommodation” under WIS. STAT. § 111.34(1)(b).3 Target, 217 Wis. 2d at 13. This is because LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5083 - 2017-09-19
accommodation” under WIS. STAT. § 111.34(1)(b).3 Target, 217 Wis. 2d at 13. This is because LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5083 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 95
Complete Title of Case: ROBERT F. SMITH, D/B/A MIXX NIGHT CLUB, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120153 - 2014-10-14
Complete Title of Case: ROBERT F. SMITH, D/B/A MIXX NIGHT CLUB, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120153 - 2014-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in WIS. STAT. § 9.01(1)(b). Accordingly, the court reversed the results of the Board’s recount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239987 - 2019-04-30
in WIS. STAT. § 9.01(1)(b). Accordingly, the court reversed the results of the Board’s recount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239987 - 2019-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
in violation of SCR 60.04(1)(g)1.b., which created the appearance of partiality in violation of § 757.19(2)(g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140357 - 2015-04-22
in violation of SCR 60.04(1)(g)1.b., which created the appearance of partiality in violation of § 757.19(2)(g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140357 - 2015-04-22