Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 72987 for we.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 72987 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 For the levy year 2013, the City issued an assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181541 - 2017-09-21
. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 For the levy year 2013, the City issued an assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181541 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the lawsuit. We conclude that § 802.05 applies retroactively given the facts of this case and that American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05
of the lawsuit. We conclude that § 802.05 applies retroactively given the facts of this case and that American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05
Elizabeth D. Swenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
award was excessive. We affirm on all issues. ¶2 Swenson’s claim arose from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31
award was excessive. We affirm on all issues. ¶2 Swenson’s claim arose from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sharon M. Haigh
is whether Haigh was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13682 - 2005-03-31
is whether Haigh was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13682 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerold I. Giesie v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
could not deduct the payment. We disagree and reverse. Background ¶2 This case focuses, in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19758 - 2017-09-21
could not deduct the payment. We disagree and reverse. Background ¶2 This case focuses, in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19758 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sharon M. Haigh
2 was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13682 - 2017-09-21
2 was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jean Dix v. John Forrett
, and other matters. We affirm. ¶2 John Forrett objected to the amended inventory of the estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5496 - 2017-09-19
, and other matters. We affirm. ¶2 John Forrett objected to the amended inventory of the estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5496 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 974.06 (2015-16) 1 motion without a hearing. We affirm on two grounds: (1) Harden’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04
. STAT. § 974.06 (2015-16) 1 motion without a hearing. We affirm on two grounds: (1) Harden’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. We conclude that the circuit court judge was not biased and that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101162 - 2013-08-21
discretion. We conclude that the circuit court judge was not biased and that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101162 - 2013-08-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
prosecutor. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
prosecutor. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28