Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55041 - 55050 of 69967 for as he.
Search results 55041 - 55050 of 69967 for as he.
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
that he had done two of the four break-ins. The investigator further testified that when Czarnecki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10227 - 2005-03-31
that he had done two of the four break-ins. The investigator further testified that when Czarnecki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10227 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
argues that he should have had the benefit of the statute and the de novo hearing was not timely held
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132787 - 2015-01-13
argues that he should have had the benefit of the statute and the de novo hearing was not timely held
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132787 - 2015-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of punishments he faced, the constitutional rights he waived by entering a plea, and the direct consequences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235093 - 2019-02-13
of punishments he faced, the constitutional rights he waived by entering a plea, and the direct consequences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235093 - 2019-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the plea hearing, Dahl admitted that he was convicted of a felony during the five-year period immediately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129555 - 2017-09-21
at the plea hearing, Dahl admitted that he was convicted of a felony during the five-year period immediately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129555 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
it further. As noted, Jamroz filed a response to counsel’s no-merit report. In it, he complains that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125161 - 2014-10-28
it further. As noted, Jamroz filed a response to counsel’s no-merit report. In it, he complains that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125161 - 2014-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Headrick contends that he was entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1122939 - 2026-05-27
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Headrick contends that he was entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1122939 - 2026-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the elements of the offenses, the penalties that could be imposed, and the constitutional rights he waived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109476 - 2017-09-21
of the elements of the offenses, the penalties that could be imposed, and the constitutional rights he waived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109476 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the $89,180 was for labor only.” It also noted that Felski “never claims he paid for any materials nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107304 - 2017-09-21
that the $89,180 was for labor only.” It also noted that Felski “never claims he paid for any materials nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
or the trials of two co-defendants. White went on to name eighteen “witnesses of interest” for whom he sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36760 - 2014-09-15
or the trials of two co-defendants. White went on to name eighteen “witnesses of interest” for whom he sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36760 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dean C. Trepanier
by concluding he was ineligible for the earned release program. We reject Trepanier’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
by concluding he was ineligible for the earned release program. We reject Trepanier’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31