Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55081 - 55090 of 83359 for simple case search.
Search results 55081 - 55090 of 83359 for simple case search.
State v. Thomas C. Smith
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2004 WI App 2, ¶21, 269 Wis. 2d 260, 674 N.W.2d 594 (citation omitted). In that case, we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31117 - 2014-09-15
, 2004 WI App 2, ¶21, 269 Wis. 2d 260, 674 N.W.2d 594 (citation omitted). In that case, we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31117 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871640 - 2024-11-06
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871640 - 2024-11-06
State v. Ralph D. Smythe
. A refusal hearing was held on stipulated facts, and the case was submitted to the court on the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13222 - 2005-03-31
. A refusal hearing was held on stipulated facts, and the case was submitted to the court on the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13222 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gary E. Waters
, such as the victims not immediately reporting the assaults, continuing to have contact with Waters, wanting the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5753 - 2017-09-19
, such as the victims not immediately reporting the assaults, continuing to have contact with Waters, wanting the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5753 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Zenobia W.
. The case proceeded to the dispositional hearing, during which Zenobia contested termination. Gwen Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6865 - 2017-09-20
. The case proceeded to the dispositional hearing, during which Zenobia contested termination. Gwen Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6865 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
This case is distinguishable from Riekkoff, however. In that case, the defendant pled guilty believing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
This case is distinguishable from Riekkoff, however. In that case, the defendant pled guilty believing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
State v. Karla R. Merkes
assessed on a case-by-case basis. Id. Such tests were not necessary in this case because, as we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4030 - 2005-03-31
assessed on a case-by-case basis. Id. Such tests were not necessary in this case because, as we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4030 - 2005-03-31
State v. John H. H., Jr.
) Brief of appellant…. The brief must contain: …. (d) A statement of the case, which must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
) Brief of appellant…. The brief must contain: …. (d) A statement of the case, which must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Sheboygan County: JAMES J. BOLGERT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30473 - 2014-09-15
court for Sheboygan County: JAMES J. BOLGERT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30473 - 2014-09-15