Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55091 - 55100 of 83389 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
or of the public to hear the case, the court shall enter an order waiving jurisdiction …. ¶7 Waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28032 - 2007-02-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Properties, LLC, appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing this case upon stipulation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325497 - 2021-01-20

A.I.M. Returnable Packaging Solutions, Inc. v. Rose Stafford
as a sanction for the failure to comply with a court order is appropriate only in cases of egregious conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7331 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s ruling that the State cannot introduce the statement in its case-in-chief, but reverse its ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55524 - 2010-10-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to hear M.M.’s case because it was contested. Consequently, counsel argued that the petitions should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248066 - 2019-10-09

[PDF] Dawn K. Larson v. Russell T. Larson
. The trial court’s failure to conduct a colloquy in that case was but one of several circumstances causing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6277 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Zenobia W.
. The case proceeded to the dispositional hearing, during which Zenobia contested termination. Gwen Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6864 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Zenobia W.
. The case proceeded to the dispositional hearing, during which Zenobia contested termination. Gwen Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6863 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on our review of Field’s brief and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039471 - 2025-11-20

State v. Charles B. Dietzen
in this case. By the Court.—Order affirmed. Not recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31