Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5511 - 5520 of 25835 for bench warrant/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s factual findings at a bench trial under the “clearly erroneous” standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229413 - 2018-12-06

[PDF] Edwin Tallard v. Northern States Power Company
the trial court to resolve disputed factual matters as though the case had been tried as a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12263 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rule Order
, regrettably (in my opinion) the majority did not give notice to or seek comments from the bench, bar
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149404 - 2017-09-21

Leo Fries v. Larson Manufacturing Company of Iowa, Inc.
declared: Whatever the merit of the plaintiff’s underlying claim may have been, I have been on the bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12721 - 2005-03-31

Bettendorf Transfer, Inc. v. Madison Freight Systems, Inc.
. Bettendorf claimed Madison was responsible for $34,373.30 in damages to the leased property. After a bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5907 - 2005-03-31

Lilie-Jean Awsumb v. David A. Thompson
pendens. The Thompsons counterclaimed for slander of title. ¶7 After a bench trial, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7312 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
recognized that. The reality of it is I’ve been here now for eighteen years on this bench, and there are some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53663 - 2010-08-23

William Charles Sharp v. Thomas M. Hughes
they had easements over the “new road.” After a two-day bench trial, the court made findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18163 - 2005-05-16

COURT OF APPEALS
an ordinance adopting that section. At the conclusion of the bench trial, the circuit court found Kettner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49183 - 2010-04-19

[PDF] State v. Dillard Earl Kelley, Sr.
for agreeing to a bench trial and for not confronting or cross-examining the State’s witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19223 - 2017-09-21