Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5511 - 5520 of 72987 for we.
Search results 5511 - 5520 of 72987 for we.
State v. Brian C. Wegner
exercised its discretion when it sentenced him after probation revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion when it sentenced him after probation revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneously applied the doctrine of in pari delicto to dismiss the case. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39705 - 2014-09-15
erroneously applied the doctrine of in pari delicto to dismiss the case. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39705 - 2014-09-15
Rosemary G. O'Brien v. Craig P. O'Brien
assistance of counsel, were violated. We reject her arguments and affirm the judgment. Rosemary and Craig
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14679 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel, were violated. We reject her arguments and affirm the judgment. Rosemary and Craig
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14679 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Ron Heeg appeals from a harassment injunction obtained by Karen Davis. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29171 - 2007-05-23
PER CURIAM. Ron Heeg appeals from a harassment injunction obtained by Karen Davis. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29171 - 2007-05-23
[PDF]
State v. Brian C. Wegner
it sentenced him after probation No. 99-3079-CR 2 revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21
it sentenced him after probation No. 99-3079-CR 2 revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21
State v. James L. Gilmore
was ineffective. We also review whether: (1) the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12538 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective. We also review whether: (1) the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12538 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying reconsideration. We agree with the circuit court that the proper way to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81587 - 2012-04-30
an order denying reconsideration. We agree with the circuit court that the proper way to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81587 - 2012-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, requiring suppression of the evidence police obtained following the stop and arrest. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22
, requiring suppression of the evidence police obtained following the stop and arrest. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22
State v. Tdurado Jacques Head
of his statutory right to an extra peremptory challenge.[1] We first conclude that Head’s attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13574 - 2005-03-31
of his statutory right to an extra peremptory challenge.[1] We first conclude that Head’s attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13574 - 2005-03-31
Patrick J. Connors v. Don Slama
it reasonably could be inferred that he was a licensed broker, we reverse the judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2238 - 2005-03-31
it reasonably could be inferred that he was a licensed broker, we reverse the judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2238 - 2005-03-31