Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55101 - 55110 of 83359 for simple case search.
Search results 55101 - 55110 of 83359 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
OWI offenses. We consolidated their cases as they raised identical challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86779 - 2012-09-04
OWI offenses. We consolidated their cases as they raised identical challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86779 - 2012-09-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Sheboygan County: JAMES J. BOLGERT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30473 - 2014-09-15
court for Sheboygan County: JAMES J. BOLGERT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30473 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Village of Avoca v. Gail Carr
not, in any case, exceed a height of 6 feet, shall not exceed a height of 4 feet in the front yard and shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3232 - 2017-09-19
not, in any case, exceed a height of 6 feet, shall not exceed a height of 4 feet in the front yard and shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3232 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
), stating: [y]ou are to serve to your mandatory release date. This is not a case where the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34814 - 2014-09-15
), stating: [y]ou are to serve to your mandatory release date. This is not a case where the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34814 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
A.I.M. Returnable Packaging Solutions, Inc. v. Rose Stafford
. 2 The record does not establish the trial date for the divorce case and the corporate claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7331 - 2017-09-20
. 2 The record does not establish the trial date for the divorce case and the corporate claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7331 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
court within the thirty-day limitation period of § 68.13(1). ¶5 In this case, it is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56175 - 2014-09-15
court within the thirty-day limitation period of § 68.13(1). ¶5 In this case, it is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56175 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Derek W. v. Susan K.B.
not visited or communicated with Brenda. ¶4 The case proceeded to a fact-finding hearing before a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4074 - 2017-09-20
not visited or communicated with Brenda. ¶4 The case proceeded to a fact-finding hearing before a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4074 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Richmond
the defendant holding the tote bag. The case was sent to the jury. The jury sent five questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
the defendant holding the tote bag. The case was sent to the jury. The jury sent five questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959265 - 2025-05-21
of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959265 - 2025-05-21