Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55121 - 55130 of 68246 for law.

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Strand
of Strand’s release. The court determined as a matter of law that Strand was within ninety days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3906 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. David J. Lenz
thereof to undisputed facts are matters of law that we review de novo. See State v. Slaughter, 200 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15331 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Edward T.
and properly granted a continuance under WIS. STAT. § 48.315(2) presents a question of law we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21562 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI App 247
of Robert K. Steuer Law Office of Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27255 - 2006-12-19

COURT OF APPEALS
a reasonable judge or court could arrive at by the consideration of the relevant law, the facts, and a process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130922 - 2014-12-01

State v. Dennis P. Smith
law that we decide de novo. Id., ¶11. We conclude the record establishes a proper waiver of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24

COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35051 - 2008-12-29

WI App 29 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1304 Complete Title of...
of law that we review without deference to the trial court’s decision. Murr v. St. Croix Cnty. Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92330 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] State v. Tom Sweeney
fact and law. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. The trial court's findings as to what the attorney did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10020 - 2017-09-19

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Kenneth P. Mader
a question of law which we decide independently of the trial court. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. DPI, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12140 - 2005-03-31