Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55121 - 55130 of 83433 for simple case search.
Search results 55121 - 55130 of 83433 for simple case search.
Winnebago County DH&HS v. Lisa L.
rights is discretionary, in this case the court erroneously exercised its discretion because the starting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24837 - 2006-04-18
rights is discretionary, in this case the court erroneously exercised its discretion because the starting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24837 - 2006-04-18
Town of East Troy v. Village of Mukwonago
., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 ANDERSON, J. This case involves a motion to intervene. Claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4874 - 2005-03-31
., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 ANDERSON, J. This case involves a motion to intervene. Claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4874 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In the instant case, the sentencing court’s oral pronouncement on count two imposed but stayed “the max; two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181647 - 2017-09-21
. In the instant case, the sentencing court’s oral pronouncement on count two imposed but stayed “the max; two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943547 - 2025-04-23
at trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943547 - 2025-04-23
State v. Thomas B.
, but the court suppressed the statements taken on July 18, 1996, regarding the razor blades. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12458 - 2005-03-31
, but the court suppressed the statements taken on July 18, 1996, regarding the razor blades. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12458 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelly J. Kloss
the defendant. ¶8 The balance of Kloss’s motion recited relevant case law establishing a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15248 - 2005-03-31
the defendant. ¶8 The balance of Kloss’s motion recited relevant case law establishing a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15248 - 2005-03-31
Yourchuck Video, Inc. v. Burnett County
-deprivation remedy.” ¶7 In this case, the County’s only response to Yourchuck’s constitutional argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18803 - 2005-07-05
-deprivation remedy.” ¶7 In this case, the County’s only response to Yourchuck’s constitutional argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18803 - 2005-07-05
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Charmaine B.
in extraordinary circumstances. “Moot cases will be decided on the merits only in the most exceptional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14355 - 2014-09-15
in extraordinary circumstances. “Moot cases will be decided on the merits only in the most exceptional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14355 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Suamico Sanitary District No. 1 v. Midwest Contractors, Inc.
In Waukesha Concrete, as in this case, a subcontractor brought an action against the surety for money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5126 - 2017-09-19
In Waukesha Concrete, as in this case, a subcontractor brought an action against the surety for money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5126 - 2017-09-19