Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55131 - 55140 of 57675 for id.
Search results 55131 - 55140 of 57675 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
observations with respect to field sobriety tests as we do any other observations by the officer. Id., ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36315 - 2014-09-15
observations with respect to field sobriety tests as we do any other observations by the officer. Id., ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36315 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to raise the issue is presented. Id. ¶10 The Escalona-Naranjo rules apply with equal force where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27303 - 2014-09-15
to raise the issue is presented. Id. ¶10 The Escalona-Naranjo rules apply with equal force where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27303 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a party’s argument, that argument is deemed rejected. Id. (“An appellate court is not a performing bear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99712 - 2014-09-15
a party’s argument, that argument is deemed rejected. Id. (“An appellate court is not a performing bear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99712 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anou Lo
perspective at the time.” Id. at 689. To meet the prejudice test, Lo must show that, but for defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11915 - 2005-03-31
perspective at the time.” Id. at 689. To meet the prejudice test, Lo must show that, but for defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11915 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of record fail to support its decision. Id. ¶11 Here, we conclude that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815599 - 2024-06-18
of record fail to support its decision. Id. ¶11 Here, we conclude that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815599 - 2024-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 301 Wis. 2d 1, ¶18. ¶6 A traffic stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
, 301 Wis. 2d 1, ¶18. ¶6 A traffic stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63282 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
basis alleged in a CHIPS petition. Id. at 301. Jennifer R.M. also contends that a “specific finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31512 - 2008-01-16
basis alleged in a CHIPS petition. Id. at 301. Jennifer R.M. also contends that a “specific finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31512 - 2008-01-16
COURT OF APPEALS
for any custody “in connection with the course of conduct for which sentence was imposed.” Id.; see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33703 - 2008-08-12
for any custody “in connection with the course of conduct for which sentence was imposed.” Id.; see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33703 - 2008-08-12
State v. Timothy M. F.
the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. Assuming, without deciding, that the State was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7264 - 2005-03-31
the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. Assuming, without deciding, that the State was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to whether that discretion was properly exercised.” Id.; see also Forest Cty. v. Goode, 215 Wis. 2d 218
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236008 - 2019-02-26
to whether that discretion was properly exercised.” Id.; see also Forest Cty. v. Goode, 215 Wis. 2d 218
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236008 - 2019-02-26