Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55131 - 55140 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 55131 - 55140 of 83958 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Edward Parker
consideration of the case, (2) whether permitting the jury to view them would be unduly prejudicial to a party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11074 - 2017-09-19
consideration of the case, (2) whether permitting the jury to view them would be unduly prejudicial to a party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11074 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
to withdraw and in September 1997, the court granted the motion. The case was continued so new counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw and in September 1997, the court granted the motion. The case was continued so new counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court. After the Logans presented their case, Schultz moved to dismiss the complaint based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134849 - 2017-09-21
court. After the Logans presented their case, Schultz moved to dismiss the complaint based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134849 - 2017-09-21
State v. Matthew Gray
. If the other acts evidence was erroneously admitted in this case, the second issue presented is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14307 - 2005-03-31
. If the other acts evidence was erroneously admitted in this case, the second issue presented is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14307 - 2005-03-31
Melvin R. Smith, Jr. v. Linda A. Smith
its discretion, we affirm the order.[2] ¶2 This case has an extensive procedural history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6826 - 2005-03-31
its discretion, we affirm the order.[2] ¶2 This case has an extensive procedural history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6826 - 2005-03-31
State v. Woodrow K. Bartlett
. at ¶28. ¶20 We conclude that the caller in this case was not anonymous. Indeed, she provided enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3951 - 2005-03-31
. at ¶28. ¶20 We conclude that the caller in this case was not anonymous. Indeed, she provided enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3951 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy J. Pluemer
, the implied consent law, and apply it to the facts in this case. We accept the factual findings of a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19708 - 2005-09-21
, the implied consent law, and apply it to the facts in this case. We accept the factual findings of a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19708 - 2005-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (defendant in speeding case may claim defense of legal justification if conduct of a law enforcement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154946 - 2017-09-21
) (defendant in speeding case may claim defense of legal justification if conduct of a law enforcement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154946 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Katherine Kaatz v. Tommy E. Hamilton
the benefit of the bargain rule in intentional misrepresentation cases. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., 94 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10335 - 2017-09-20
the benefit of the bargain rule in intentional misrepresentation cases. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., 94 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10335 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
would be free to argue for a different sentence. The trial court accepted Lowe’s pleas and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2013-04-08
would be free to argue for a different sentence. The trial court accepted Lowe’s pleas and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2013-04-08