Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55151 - 55160 of 61940 for judgment.
Search results 55151 - 55160 of 61940 for judgment.
Ray A. Peterson v. Regina K. Buie
as required by Wis. Stat. § 704.17(2)(a), and that Buie did not comply, thus entitling Peterson to a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5044 - 2005-03-31
as required by Wis. Stat. § 704.17(2)(a), and that Buie did not comply, thus entitling Peterson to a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5044 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other issues of arguable merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98828 - 2013-07-01
of the record discloses no other issues of arguable merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98828 - 2013-07-01
State v. Gilberto Flores
appealed the judgment of conviction and the trial court's sentencing order. This court summarily affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9864 - 2005-03-31
appealed the judgment of conviction and the trial court's sentencing order. This court summarily affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
specified in the judgment of conviction, the Department lost subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. Goodall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072060 - 2026-02-05
specified in the judgment of conviction, the Department lost subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. Goodall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072060 - 2026-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Hammersley agreed to the entry of judgment on a speeding forfeiture. No. 2013AP1263 4 ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109207 - 2017-09-21
, Hammersley agreed to the entry of judgment on a speeding forfeiture. No. 2013AP1263 4 ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109207 - 2017-09-21
City of Waukesha v. Kathleen M. Allen
(holding that court commissioner was without jurisdiction to hear or enter judgment in a criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14005 - 2005-03-31
(holding that court commissioner was without jurisdiction to hear or enter judgment in a criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.30 postconviction motion, and the judgment and order were affirmed on appeal. State v. Lewis, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111421 - 2017-09-21
809.30 postconviction motion, and the judgment and order were affirmed on appeal. State v. Lewis, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111421 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is treated as a motion for summary judgment. See Wis. Stat. § 802.06(2)(b). Upon review, we perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85656 - 2012-07-31
is treated as a motion for summary judgment. See Wis. Stat. § 802.06(2)(b). Upon review, we perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85656 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶11 Walker nevertheless argues the circuit court improperly based portions of its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114853 - 2017-09-21
.” ¶11 Walker nevertheless argues the circuit court improperly based portions of its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[the agency’s] will and not its judgment.’” See Coleman v. Percy, 96 Wis. 2d 578, 588, 292 N.W.2d 615 (1980
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10
[the agency’s] will and not its judgment.’” See Coleman v. Percy, 96 Wis. 2d 578, 588, 292 N.W.2d 615 (1980
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10