Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55151 - 55160 of 83139 for simple case search.
Search results 55151 - 55160 of 83139 for simple case search.
State v. Brian M.
, 381 N.W.2d 333 (1986). ¶10 Davis, however, is distinguishable from the case at hand. The Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6457 - 2005-03-31
, 381 N.W.2d 333 (1986). ¶10 Davis, however, is distinguishable from the case at hand. The Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6457 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian M.
, 381 N.W.2d 333 (1986). ¶10 Davis, however, is distinguishable from the case at hand. The Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6458 - 2005-03-31
, 381 N.W.2d 333 (1986). ¶10 Davis, however, is distinguishable from the case at hand. The Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6458 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner may be certified to the branch of court to which the case has been assigned, upon a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459967 - 2021-12-09
commissioner may be certified to the branch of court to which the case has been assigned, upon a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459967 - 2021-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
This case is distinguishable from Riekkoff, however. In that case, the defendant pled guilty believing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
This case is distinguishable from Riekkoff, however. In that case, the defendant pled guilty believing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
State v. John L. Kuslits
in this case. ¶6 The trial court sentenced Kuslits to consecutive and concurrent terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6859 - 2005-03-31
in this case. ¶6 The trial court sentenced Kuslits to consecutive and concurrent terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6859 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 9
2007 WI 9 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2005AP537-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27894 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI 9 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2005AP537-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27894 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Derek W. v. Susan K.B.
not visited or communicated with Brenda. ¶4 The case proceeded to a fact-finding hearing before a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4074 - 2017-09-20
not visited or communicated with Brenda. ¶4 The case proceeded to a fact-finding hearing before a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4074 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. A. David McCormack
counsel would be prepared to try the case within a short time. The court could also have reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8192 - 2017-09-19
counsel would be prepared to try the case within a short time. The court could also have reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In the instant case, the sentencing court’s oral pronouncement on count two imposed but stayed “the max; two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181647 - 2017-09-21
. In the instant case, the sentencing court’s oral pronouncement on count two imposed but stayed “the max; two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325544 - 2021-01-20
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325544 - 2021-01-20