Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5521 - 5530 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5521 - 5530 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
La Crosse County v. David W. Watters
Watters’s conviction for OMVWI is a question of law that we review de novo. Monroe County v. Kruse, 76 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4921 - 2005-03-31
Watters’s conviction for OMVWI is a question of law that we review de novo. Monroe County v. Kruse, 76 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4921 - 2005-03-31
State v. Landris T. Jines
is prejudicial to the defense is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Brunette, 220 Wis. 2d 431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18671 - 2005-06-22
is prejudicial to the defense is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Brunette, 220 Wis. 2d 431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18671 - 2005-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28839 - 2007-04-30
was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28839 - 2007-04-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
American Family. Whether a motion to dismiss was properly granted is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017755 - 2025-10-01
American Family. Whether a motion to dismiss was properly granted is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017755 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Jennifer is free to file a new motion. We will not, however, consider Jennifer’s motion de novo under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
that Jennifer is free to file a new motion. We will not, however, consider Jennifer’s motion de novo under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
Jevic Enterprises, Inc. v. Arlo E. Schultz
a question of law, which we review de novo. Waukesha Concrete Products Co., Inc. v. Capital Indem. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3927 - 2017-09-20
a question of law, which we review de novo. Waukesha Concrete Products Co., Inc. v. Capital Indem. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3927 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57518 - 2014-09-15
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment de novo, applying the standards set forth in § 802.08. We first look at “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120140 - 2014-09-15
summary judgment de novo, applying the standards set forth in § 802.08. We first look at “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120140 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dolores Demir v. Ahmet Demir
of law, which we review de novo. DOR v. Sentry Fin., 161 Wis.2d 902, 910, 469 N.W.2d 235, 238 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9731 - 2017-09-19
of law, which we review de novo. DOR v. Sentry Fin., 161 Wis.2d 902, 910, 469 N.W.2d 235, 238 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9731 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Terrence A. Hood
court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3324 - 2017-09-19
court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3324 - 2017-09-19