Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55201 - 55210 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 55201 - 55210 of 83395 for simple case search.
State v. Robert J. Ketner
of the trial court, and (3) although § 346.63(1)(c), as interpreted by case law, requires dismissal of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10077 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court, and (3) although § 346.63(1)(c), as interpreted by case law, requires dismissal of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10077 - 2005-03-31
Kristine M. Downer-Beuthin v. John J. Beuthin
. This evidence consisted of Exhibit 2 in case number 93-FA18, dated November 14, 1994, seven months before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7208 - 2005-03-31
. This evidence consisted of Exhibit 2 in case number 93-FA18, dated November 14, 1994, seven months before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7208 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127892 - 2014-11-09
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127892 - 2014-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
owns lake property in Waupaca County. Underlying this case is a nonconforming shed on the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46368 - 2010-01-27
owns lake property in Waupaca County. Underlying this case is a nonconforming shed on the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46368 - 2010-01-27
CA Blank Order
counsel to file a supplemental no-merit report addressing the plea-taking procedure in this case.[2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
counsel to file a supplemental no-merit report addressing the plea-taking procedure in this case.[2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
La Crosse County DHS v. Sharon P.
hearing. Due to the complexity of the case, the court gave the parties ninety days to complete any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20574 - 2005-12-07
hearing. Due to the complexity of the case, the court gave the parties ninety days to complete any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20574 - 2005-12-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying postconviction relief. ¶2 This is the second appeal spawned by this case. In the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29039 - 2014-09-15
denying postconviction relief. ¶2 This is the second appeal spawned by this case. In the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29039 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227434 - 2018-11-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227434 - 2018-11-21
[PDF]
Winnebago County DH&HS v. Lisa L.
parental rights is discretionary, in this case the court erroneously exercised its discretion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24837 - 2017-09-21
parental rights is discretionary, in this case the court erroneously exercised its discretion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24837 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas C. Smith
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case,” and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31