Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55221 - 55230 of 61940 for judgment.

City of Madison v. John M. Virnig
of a City of Madison municipal ordinance adopted in conformity with § 346.63(1), Stats. A judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12327 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36016 - 2009-03-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143492 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
or judgment of the other jurisdiction constitutes misconduct. No. 2019AP1426-D 3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249012 - 2019-12-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
summary the State prepared. On direct appeal, we affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ivy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204368 - 2017-12-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the judgment of conviction. 2 There is no evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215633 - 2018-07-18

COURT OF APPEALS
party to the original judgment.” Lofthus, 270 Wis. 2d 515, ¶17. Whether there is a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35734 - 2009-03-04

COURT OF APPEALS
the underlying judgments of conviction. The Honorable David L. Borowski entered the orders denying Haywood’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133146 - 2015-01-20

Melanie O'Kane v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, inadvertencies or ordinary negligence in isolated instances, or good faith errors in judgment or discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7166 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion. We rejected Miller’s arguments and affirmed both the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113858 - 2014-06-09