Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55281 - 55290 of 68202 for law.

Cornell Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
a claim is a question of law we review without deference to the circuit court. See State ex rel. Hansen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13732 - 2005-03-31

Daniel Grossen v. Gary Grossen
the appropriate legal principles is a question of law that we decide de novo. Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Elec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25783 - 2006-07-05

COURT OF APPEALS
of the constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel presents a mixed question of law and fact.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39257 - 2009-08-10

Douglas County Child Support Enforcement Unit for Dianne Niemi v. Robert P. Fisher
of a statute, we are presented with questions of law that we review without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9382 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 38
, it is settled law that first-degree reckless endangerment under Wis. Stat. § 941.30(1) is a lesser included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28118 - 2007-03-27

COURT OF APPEALS
Determining whether a contract is ambiguous presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43059 - 2009-11-10

State v. Tartorius Allen
behavior to justify a stop by law enforcement. Relying upon State v. Young, 212 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14143 - 2005-03-31

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Marcia K. Johnson
a question of law which we decide independently of the trial court. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. DPI, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12137 - 2005-03-31

Town of Dekorra v. Dorothy Franzen
determination presents a mixed question of fact and law, requiring findings concerning the sequence of events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14736 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
is defined in the ordinance. He argued, however, that this use was a lawful, nonconforming use because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15