Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55281 - 55290 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 55281 - 55290 of 74898 for public records.
Alice Howard v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
three days in a row. Based on our review of the administrative agency’s decision and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3449 - 2005-03-31
three days in a row. Based on our review of the administrative agency’s decision and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3449 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis E. Jones
has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12203 - 2005-03-31
has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12203 - 2005-03-31
David W. Junge v. Peter W. Messer, M.D.
or misplaced by a person or persons in the judicial system.[2] Because the record, as it stands, supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20858 - 2006-01-09
or misplaced by a person or persons in the judicial system.[2] Because the record, as it stands, supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20858 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605765 - 2022-12-29
independently reviewed the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605765 - 2022-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166467 - 2017-09-21
that “there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and did not investigate his alibi. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449421 - 2021-11-09
and did not investigate his alibi. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449421 - 2021-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33016 - 2008-06-16
will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33016 - 2008-06-16
State v. Colin N. Gelford
of these issues was properly preserved for appeal. In addition, although the current record is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11613 - 2005-03-31
of these issues was properly preserved for appeal. In addition, although the current record is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11613 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record that Stewart “verbally acknowledged his understanding” that the court could exceed the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56193 - 2010-11-02
in the record that Stewart “verbally acknowledged his understanding” that the court could exceed the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56193 - 2010-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
Attorney’s Office, moved to dismiss and submitted CCAP records related to Conley’s underlying convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95670 - 2013-04-22
Attorney’s Office, moved to dismiss and submitted CCAP records related to Conley’s underlying convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95670 - 2013-04-22