Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55321 - 55330 of 64716 for b's.

[PDF] NOTICE
.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35919 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B. HUBER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60983 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
court for Dane County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Dykman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26780 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. At the sentencing hearing, the prosecutor identified a math error, explaining that under WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(b
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191802 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Appeal No. 2007AP1396 Cir. Ct. No. 2007CV194
for judicial review of Administrative Procedures Act); and WIS. STAT. § 971.14(4)(b) (competency determination
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33133 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. (2011-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125231 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(b)4. 2019-01-15T07:45:48-0600 CCAP-CDS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232745 - 2019-01-15

[PDF] State v. Henry Pocan
an evidentiary hearing under WIS. STAT. § 980.09(2)(b) because “[a] plausible argument has not been made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18852 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.—Judgment and orders affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210670 - 2018-04-05

[PDF] State v. Donald Mitchell
. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14342 - 2014-09-15