Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55381 - 55390 of 69587 for as he.
Search results 55381 - 55390 of 69587 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Burgus
and placed Burgus on probation for three years with the conditions that he serve a seven-month jail term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8667 - 2017-09-19
and placed Burgus on probation for three years with the conditions that he serve a seven-month jail term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8667 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Tina Arciszewski v. Dan Hurlbutt
an order requiring that he pay child support in the sum of $430 per month for his two minor children.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13080 - 2017-09-21
an order requiring that he pay child support in the sum of $430 per month for his two minor children.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13080 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
D. Sims appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214443 - 2018-06-20
D. Sims appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214443 - 2018-06-20
Aring Equipment Company, Inc. v. All-Ways Snow & Ice Control Contractors, Inc.
, the Aring salesperson who dealt with All Ways, testified that he and Christopher Michels, All Ways
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10675 - 2005-03-31
, the Aring salesperson who dealt with All Ways, testified that he and Christopher Michels, All Ways
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10675 - 2005-03-31
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
that awarded Donna and John Harr statutory costs.[1] He maintains that the trial court’s award was not timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31
that awarded Donna and John Harr statutory costs.[1] He maintains that the trial court’s award was not timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court to modify his sentence because the court did not explain the length of the sentence and why he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
court to modify his sentence because the court did not explain the length of the sentence and why he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to respond, but he did not do so. After reviewing the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242349 - 2019-06-14
was advised of his right to respond, but he did not do so. After reviewing the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242349 - 2019-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the extensions of time he requested, he has not exercised his right to do so. From our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146731 - 2017-09-21
the extensions of time he requested, he has not exercised his right to do so. From our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146731 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, as a repeater. Before sentencing, Rodriguez moved to withdraw his plea on the ground that he was actually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96625 - 2013-05-06
, as a repeater. Before sentencing, Rodriguez moved to withdraw his plea on the ground that he was actually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96625 - 2013-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
was created by the contempt order limiting contact between Stumpner and their child. He also pointed out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57878 - 2010-12-15
was created by the contempt order limiting contact between Stumpner and their child. He also pointed out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57878 - 2010-12-15