Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55391 - 55400 of 68259 for law.

[PDF] State v. Shomas T. Winston
of counsel claim presents a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Erickson, 227 Wis. 2d 758, 768, 596
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25688 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
violations in three steps, each of which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102961 - 2017-09-21

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Willie Quattlebaum
a question of law which we decide independently of the trial court. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. DPI, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12358 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Paul W.
containing the termination of parental rights notice required by law,” but did not require jurors to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5867 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kevon D. Davidson
questions of law and fact. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 127, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6595 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Rechsteiner v. Hazelden, 2008 WI 97, ¶26, 313 Wis. 2d 542, 753 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42800 - 2009-10-28

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Mary G.
of parental rights notice required by law; (2) the department made reasonable efforts to provide the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4698 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
of counsel presents a mixed question of law and fact.” State v. Trawitzki, 2001 WI 77, ¶19, 244 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39257 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Town of Grand Chute v. U.S. Paper Converters, Inc.
and statutes to a particular set of facts present questions of law we review de novo. Eastman v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14560 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to rule against [Atinsky] on that anyway,” in part, based on “applicable, if not controlling” case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87143 - 2014-09-15