Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5541 - 5550 of 16438 for commenting.

[PDF] Jeffrey E. Piper v. Valeria J. Piper
judge could reach. We have previously commented as follows regarding the deference we accord
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13478 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. See SCR 20:3.1, comment (action is not frivolous even though the lawyer believes his or her client’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104202 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that his trial counsel was ineffective by not presenting an expert to comment on a video interview
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231250 - 2018-12-20

[PDF] State v. Tanya M. Luchinski
only comment was a request that the start of her probation be delayed for thirty days to permit her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15637 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FORM SUMMARY
“Disposition” to apply to items 3-6. Comments: All notices are now sent to the school board or its designee
/formdisplay/JD-1725_summary.pdf?formNumber=JD-1725&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-05-30

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
[the State’s] recommendation.” We disagree with Ritchie’s characterization of the prosecutor’s comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99493 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, the perpetrator made the same kind of comments to the different victims, the crimes occurred in the same area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26755 - 2006-10-16

COURT OF APPEALS
relied on inaccurate information. The transcript of the circuit court’s sentencing comments shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56493 - 2010-11-08

Supreme Court of Wisconsin Judicial Conduct Advisory Committee OPIN...
military. In addition, the COMMENT to this section states, inter alia: A judge is prohibited
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74794 - 2011-11-30

Vicki L. Johnson v. Christopher T. Johnson
considered their testimony. Its failure to comment on their testimony is not synonymous with ignoring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10446 - 2005-03-31