Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5541 - 5550 of 72753 for we.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403075 - 2021-08-03

[PDF] State v. Sharon M. Haigh
2 was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13682 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Brian C. Wegner
it sentenced him after probation No. 99-3079-CR 2 revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Elizabeth D. Swenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
the damage award was excessive. We affirm on all issues. ¶2 Swenson’s claim arose from an incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15808 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in State v. Rector, 2023 WI 41, __ Wis. 2d __, 990 N.W.2d 213, we conclude that the Department may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668838 - 2023-06-15

COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. We conclude that the circuit court judge was not biased and that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101162 - 2013-08-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and physical placement, child support, and sanctions. We affirm. We also deny motions by each party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86547 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, requiring suppression of the evidence police obtained following the stop and arrest. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58132 - 2010-12-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 974.06 (2015-16) 1 motion without a hearing. We affirm on two grounds: (1) Harden’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04

State v. Jeremy A. Janz
a double jeopardy bar to reconvening the trial. We see no error and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13927 - 2005-03-31