Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5541 - 5550 of 50680 for writ of certiorari forms.

Penelope L. Von Haden v. Village of Eleva Zoning Board of Appeals
a judgment denying certiorari relief from a decision of the Village of Eleva Zoning Board of Appeals to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11813 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 185 N.W.2d 306 (1971) (judicial review of probation revocation is by petition for certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606134 - 2022-12-30

Matthew Triolo v. Employee Trust Funds Board
then commenced this action for certiorari review, and the circuit court affirmed the Board. ¶3 The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5263 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gregory Pik v. David H. Schwarz
affirmed the decision on October 12, 1999. On certiorari review, the circuit court affirmed. Pik moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3157 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for certiorari in circuit court). The only potential appellate issues at this point in the proceedings relate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188017 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a nonconforming use. The Board upheld the committee’s decision, and Zillmer sought certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68270 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Sam Mulipola v. Gary McCaughtry
charge because it was a lesser included offense of attempting to incite a riot. On certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9018 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
) (judicial review of probation revocation is by petition for certiorari in circuit court). The only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252560 - 2020-01-16

CA Blank Order
) (judicial review of probation revocation is by way of certiorari to the court of conviction). The only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101834 - 2013-09-08

COURT OF APPEALS
certiorari review. The circuit court reversed and remanded the Board’s determination. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68270 - 2011-07-25