Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55401 - 55410 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 55401 - 55410 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no- merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336738 - 2021-02-23
considering the no- merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336738 - 2021-02-23
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107292 - 2014-01-28
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107292 - 2014-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
misleading information, Best attaches several documents to his brief that are not part of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68841 - 2011-08-01
misleading information, Best attaches several documents to his brief that are not part of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68841 - 2011-08-01
State v. Chad Constantineau
argument is based on factual and legal assertions that are not supported by the record and that erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2584 - 2005-03-31
argument is based on factual and legal assertions that are not supported by the record and that erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2584 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 39
motion for resentencing. After reviewing the record and the briefs of both parties, and after hearing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32656 - 2014-09-15
motion for resentencing. After reviewing the record and the briefs of both parties, and after hearing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32656 - 2014-09-15
Alice Howard v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
three days in a row. Based on our review of the administrative agency’s decision and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3449 - 2005-03-31
three days in a row. Based on our review of the administrative agency’s decision and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3449 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis E. Jones
has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12203 - 2005-03-31
has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12203 - 2005-03-31
David W. Junge v. Peter W. Messer, M.D.
or misplaced by a person or persons in the judicial system.[2] Because the record, as it stands, supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20858 - 2006-01-09
or misplaced by a person or persons in the judicial system.[2] Because the record, as it stands, supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20858 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605765 - 2022-12-29
independently reviewed the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605765 - 2022-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166467 - 2017-09-21
that “there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166467 - 2017-09-21