Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55471 - 55480 of 68207 for law.

River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher
and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law, which this court reviews without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16980 - 2005-03-31

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Willie Quattlebaum
a question of law which we decide independently of the trial court. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. DPI, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12358 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). A question of objective bias presents a mixed question of fact and law. See id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104433 - 2013-11-18

Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
of law that we review de novo. See Davies v. Heiman, 186 Wis.2d 370, 376, 520 N.W.2d 917, 919 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11654 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on the appropriate and applicable law.” Id. ¶6 In Lomax, reviewing the discretionary denial of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the UTV had been taken, and the dealership called law enforcement. ¶3 The State charged Veesenmeyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770086 - 2024-02-29

2011 WI APP 33
if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59802 - 2011-03-29

2010 WI APP 83
and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Section 802.08(2). The inferences to be drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50331 - 2010-06-29

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
to seek declaratory relief is a question of law we decide de novo. See Village of Slinger v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27536 - 2006-12-20

COURT OF APPEALS
as that term is defined in the ordinance. He argued, however, that this use was a lawful, nonconforming use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34251 - 2008-10-08